<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.157 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Tue, 21 May 2013 11:22:22 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Police Misconduct and Civil Rights Blog</title><link>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/</link><description>a blog of the Law Offices of Howard Friedman</description><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.157 (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><item><title>Our Client Neil Miller Describes His Time in Solitary Confinement</title><dc:creator>Law Offices of Howard Friedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:05:54 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2013/5/7/our-client-neil-miller-describes-his-time-in-solitary-confin.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">634737:12245619:33614390</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Check out this <a class="offsite-link-inline" style="color: #3333cc;" href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/05/06/use-segregation-prisons-comes-under-new-scrutiny/6HtnI5l8i8MthcQf88wP2L/story.html" target="_blank">Boston Globe article about solitary confinement</a>. The article describes the experiences of Neil Miller, a client of this firm who spent ten years in prison before he was exonerated by DNA evidence. Mr. Miller reached a landmark $3.2 million settlement with the City of Boston after this firm and the firm of firm of Cochran, Neufeld and Scheck in New York alleged civil rights violations, police misconduct, and misconduct at the police lab that resulted in Mr. Miller&rsquo;s wrongful conviction. As the article describes, Mr. Miller is still recovering from the pain of spending a decade in in prison, including time in solitary confinement, for a crime he did not commit.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-33614390.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>David Milton speaks at Northern Illinois University College of Law</title><dc:creator>Law Offices of Howard Friedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:55:26 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2013/4/30/david-milton-speaks-at-northern-illinois-university-college.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">634737:12245619:33519335</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>On April 19, David spoke at a symposium on &ldquo;Eavesdropping and Wiretapping in Illinois&rdquo; at Northern Illinois University College of Law. Despite its narrow title, the daylong event featured speakers on a wide variety of topics concerning technology, privacy, and law enforcement. David spoke about developments in the law regarding videotaping police since the First Circuit&rsquo;s landmark decision in our firm&rsquo;s case, Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011), which recognized that recording on-duty police officers is protected by the First Amendment.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-33519335.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>David Milton speaks at Harvard Law School on representing current or former drug abusers in civil rights cases</title><dc:creator>Law Offices of Howard Friedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:21:17 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2013/4/10/david-milton-speaks-at-harvard-law-school-on-representing-cu.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">634737:12245619:33278599</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>David spoke today at Harvard Law School on representing current and former substance abusers in civil rights cases. The talk focused on the many obstacles that people involved with drugs face when they seek to vindicate their rights through the civil justice system. The difficulty in securing representation and bringing a successful civil rights lawsuit leaves those involved with drugs especially vulnerable to abuse by the police. David spoke about several police misconduct and prisoners rights cases our firm has brought on behalf of drug abusers whose rights were violated by police, prison medical staff, and other public servants who viewed them as less than human. We occasionally take these very hard cases not because we expect to make a lot of money for the firm, but because we simply cannot not let certain callous and outrageous government abuse go unchallenged.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-33278599.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Judge dismisses our animal rights “terrorism” case; an appeal is likely</title><dc:creator>Law Offices of Howard Friedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:38:52 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2013/3/19/judge-dismisses-our-animal-rights-terrorism-case-an-appeal-i.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">634737:12245619:33081968</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, a federal judge dismissed Blum v. Holder, our lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of the federal Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA). Attorneys from the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York filed this case in December 2011. We are co-counsel along with Professor Alexander Reinert.</p>
<p><a class="offsite-link-inline" style="color: #3333cc;" href="http://www.ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/rights-group-condemns-dismissal-of-animal-rights-%E2%80%9Cterrorism%E2%80%9D-case" target="_blank">Here is the press release from the Center for Constitutional Rights.</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-33081968.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Boston Police Department rewards officers accused of misconduct</title><dc:creator>Law Offices of Howard Friedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:14:32 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2013/2/15/boston-police-department-rewards-officers-accused-of-miscond.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">634737:12245619:32814328</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Several Boston police officers who were accused of police brutality in high-profile cases have been awarded medals for their actions. This story first broke <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://blackstonian.com/info/2013/01/boston-police-awards-3-officers-involved-in-high-profile-brutality-cases-infused-with-race/" target="_blank">last month in the Blackstonian</a>, and this month was in the <a href="http://thephoenix.com/Boston/news/151303-bpd-adds-insult-to-injury/">Phoenix</a>. One of the awarded officers is Michael T. McManus, who can be seen throwing punches and knee strikes in the <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXDJvBaTTDQ" target="_blank">video of the Roxbury Community College beating.</a></p>
<p>McManus was also involved in the death of David Woodman. David Woodman was a twenty-two-year-old man who was walking home from the Fenway Park area after the Boston Celtics won the NBA championship in 2008. As David passed a group of police officers, including McManus, he was arrested for carrying an open container of beer. Witnesses reported that police officers slammed David to the ground.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-32814328.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Failed police tactics in New York City; from broken windows to stop-and-frisk</title><dc:creator>Law Offices of Howard Friedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:49:53 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2013/2/14/failed-police-tactics-in-new-york-city-from-broken-windows-t.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">634737:12245619:32808136</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Check out this opinion editorial in the Boston Globe by Juliette Kayyem: <a class="offsite-link-inline" style="color: #3333cc;" href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2013/02/11/numbers-matter-public-safety-reform/tTri3rl6g7LW9xJO1ZMIRK/story.html" target="_blank ">Numbers Matter in Public Safety Reform</a>. Kayyem questions the effectiveness of the New York&rsquo;s stop-and-frisk tactics. Data from the NYPD shows that of the vast numbers of people stopped-and-frisked by police officers, 9 out of 10 were black or Hispanic. This is racial profiling, and it does not reduce crime. In fact, the New York American Civil Liberties Union (NYACLU) reports that nearly <a class="offsite-link-inline" style="color: #3333cc;" href="http://www.nyclu.org/content/stop-and-frisk-data" target="_blank">9 out of 10 New Yorkers who were stopped and frisked were completely innocent</a>.</p>
<p>Kayemm&rsquo;s article compares the stop-and-frisk tactic to the police tactic favored in the 1990&rsquo;s: aggressively policing minor crimes such as breaking windows, in the hopes that there would be a consequential decline in serious crimes. The &ldquo;broken windows&rdquo; tactic was, for a time, credited with the significant reduction in crime in New York City. However, as Kayemm explains, the reduction in crime was seen across the country, not just in New York City, and data shows that the &ldquo;broken windows&rdquo; tactic was not actually effective.</p>
<p>Likewise, NYPD data now shows that the stop-and-frisk tactic is not only ineffective, but in practice embraces racial profiling. As the <a class="offsite-link-inline" style="color: #3333cc;" href="http://www.nyclu.org/node/1598" target="_blank">NYACLU summarizes</a>, the vast majority of stopped-and-frisked New Yorkers are non-white, even in primarily white neighborhoods. While violent crime has decreased in New York City, other cities without an intrusive stop-and-frisk policy experienced even larger reductions in crime. You can help learn more about the NYPD&rsquo;s discriminatory practice on the <a class="offsite-link-inline" style="color: #3333cc;" href="http://www.nyclu.org/issues/racial-justice/stop-and-frisk-practices" target="_blank">NYACLU website</a>. People in New York can use the <a class="offsite-link-inline" style="color: #3333cc;" href="http://www.nyclu.org/app" target="_blank">stop-and-frisk app</a> to record and report stop-and-frisks.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-32808136.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Why police lie under oath</title><dc:creator>Law Offices of Howard Friedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:04:44 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2013/2/12/why-police-lie-under-oath.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">634737:12245619:32796249</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Check out this&nbsp; important article in the New York Times: <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/03/opinion/sunday/why-police-officers-lie-under-oath.html?_r=0" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Why Police Lie Under Oath, by Michelle Alexander.</span></a> In the article, Michelle Alexander describes how federal grant programs richly reward police departments that arrest greater numbers of people. This causes police supervisors to compel their police officers to make more arrests. In order to meet this pressure some police officers lie and charge people with crimes even if no crime occurred.</p>
<p>Understanding the monetary motivation behind police officers&rsquo; lies is important because people often assume that officers have no reason to lie. Many people, including judges and juries, trust officers to tell the truth because it&rsquo;s hard to believe that officers could benefit from lying. However, Michelle Alexander&rsquo;s article makes it clear officers actually have a strong incentive to lie. This results in innocent people being arrested without probable cause.</p>
<p>Police officers are rarely disciplined for lying. However, in two of our cases in 2012, police officers were fired for their lies and other misconduct. <a style="color: #3333cc;" href="http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2012/3/15/boston-settles-police-brutality-case-for-14-million.html" target="_blank">Boston police officer David Williams</a> was fired for using unreasonable force on our client, and for lying about his use of excessive force. And <a style="color: #3333cc;" href="http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2012/7/11/civil-service-commission-upholds-dismissal-of-somerville-pol.html" target="_blank">Somerville Police Officer Marcos Freitas</a> was terminated because he had lied repeatedly, including some lies at a deposition taken in our case against him. Additionally, in 2004, after we filed a case against Boston police sergeant Joseph LeMoure, he was convicted of perjury for lying at his deposition and encouraging witnesses to lie. While these police officers were punished for their harmful lies and other misconduct, police officers routinely get away with lying under oath. This isn&rsquo;t going to change until the judges in criminal cases stop tolerating testimony by untruthful police officers and federal grant programs stop rewarding high arrest rates.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-32796249.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>$20,000 judgment against Boston in our lawsuit alleging police violated transgender woman’s rights; Boston Public Health Commission pays additional $10,000</title><dc:creator>Law Offices of Howard Friedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:33:21 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2013/2/5/20000-judgment-against-boston-in-our-lawsuit-alleging-police.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">634737:12245619:32752825</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Our client Brenda Wernikoff has agreed to accept a judgment against the City of Boston in which the City pays her $20,000 to resolve her claim that she was falsely arrested and subject to discrimination for using the women&rsquo;s bathroom at a homeless shelter. The lawsuit alleged that the City failed to train its police officers how to treat transgender people. The City offered to have judgment entered against it shortly after we filed the complaint.</p>
<p>Ms. Wernikoff is a transgender woman. (She was assigned male gender at birth, but she identifies as a woman and is legally female.) Boston ordinance 12-9.7 makes it illegal to discriminate against a transgender woman like Ms. Wernikoff from using women&rsquo;s bathrooms. <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.masstpc.org/pubs/Boston_TG_Ordinance.pdf" target="_blank">(Read the ordinance here.)</a> On May 19, 2010, Ms. Wernikoff was using a stall in the women&rsquo;s bathroom at the Woods Mullen Shelter. When Ms. Wernikoff emerged from her stall, BPD officer Loletha Graham-Smith arrested her for using the women&rsquo;s bathroom. At the police station, male police officers degraded Ms. Wernikoff by ordering her to remove her top and jump up and down, causing her bare breasts to jiggle for the officers&rsquo; own amusement.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-32752825.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Court approves settlement and attorneys’ fees in our lawsuit claiming New Balance toning shoes were falsely advertised</title><dc:creator>Law Offices of Howard Friedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:43:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2013/1/29/court-approves-settlement-and-attorneys-fees-in-our-lawsuit.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">634737:12245619:32707399</guid><description><![CDATA[Yesterday in federal court, at a hearing for final approval, the judge approved a class action settlement against New Balance and also determined that New Balance should pay the fees and costs of the Plaintiffs&rsquo; attorneys. New Balance agreed to pay up to $3.75 million to settle claims that the company misrepresented the benefits of wearing Toning Shoes to consumers.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-32707399.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Boston’s system to track problem police officers defunct since 2005</title><dc:creator>Law Offices of Howard Friedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:58:47 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/2013/1/16/bostons-system-to-track-problem-police-officers-defunct-sinc.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">634737:12245619:32562795</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.commonwealthmagazine.org/News-and-Features/Features/2013/Winter/003-Police-misconduct.aspx" target="_blank">Read this article in Commonwealth Magazine.</a></p>
<p>Since 2005, the Boston Police have failed to implement a system to monitor officers who are prone to misconduct. These systems, often called Early Intervention Systems (EIS), are used in police departments across the country to detect and assist police officers who may be abusing their power or experiencing a personal difficulty that is hindering their job performance. Once officers are flagged by EIS, they could receive additional training or resources, and closer supervision. Although all professions should monitor the performance of their employees, oversight is particularly important in police culture, where officers rarely report the misconduct others and complaints against police are investigated by fellow officers.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.civil-rights-law.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-32562795.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>